nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 04, v.41 352-360
燕麦草和苜蓿间作对盐碱地牧草品质及土壤质量的影响
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金(42320104006,42107311); 山东省自然科学基金(ZR2024MD110); 山东省重点研发计划(2022TZXD0045,2023TZXD005); 东营市自然科学基金(2024ZR01)
邮箱(Email): suolizhu@ldu.edu.cn;
DOI: 10.20062/j.cnki.CN37-1453/N.2025.04.008
摘要:

为探求不同间作模式对盐碱土壤的影响,提高盐碱地牧草的产量和品质,本研究以黄河三角洲地区中重度盐碱地代表性禾本科和豆科牧草为研究对象,对比分析了燕麦草(Arrhenatherum elatius(L.) Presl)和苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)单作、三行间作和五行间作种植对牧草品质和土壤质量的影响,三行间作是指燕麦草和苜蓿各自每三行为一组交替排列种植,五行间作同理。结果表明:禾豆间作模式能够显著提升牧草的产量和品质,牧草五行间作年产量为4 447.133 kg·hm-2,略高于三行间作,比燕麦草和苜蓿单作产量高7.91%和9.57%,牧草五行和三行间作模式下燕麦草蛋白质含量比单作分别高3.74%和5.22%;在土壤质量方面,间作模式下牧草样地的pH值明显下降,10~30 cm处最为明显,并促进土壤中有机质以及硝、铵态氮质量分数的增加,苜蓿单作对有机质以及硝、铵态氮质量分数的增加最显著。综上,在盐碱地实行燕麦草和苜蓿间作种植有利于提高牧草的产量和品质,对土地质量也有一定的促进作用。

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of different intercropping patterns on saline alkali soil and improve the yield and quality of grass in saline alkali land, this study selected representative grasses of Poaceae and Leguminosae in moderate to severe saline alkali land in the Yellow River Delta region as research objects, and compared and analyzed the effects of oat grass(Arrhenatherum elatius(L.) Presl) and alfalfa(Medicago sativa L.) monoculture, three row intercropping, and five row intercropping on grass quality and soil quality.Three row intercropping refers to the alternating planting of oat grass and alfalfa every three rows, and the same applies to five row intercropping.The results are as follows.The intercropping mode of grass and beans could significantly improve the yield and quality of forage.The annual yield of five row intercropping of forage was 4 447.133 kg·hm-2,slightly higher than that of three row intercropping, and 7.91% and 9.57% higher than that of oat grass and alfalfa monoculture.The protein content of oat grass under five row and three row intercropping modes was 3.74% and 5.22% higher than that of monoculture, respectively.In terms of soil quality, the pH of the grass plot significantly decreased under intercropping mode, with the most significant decrease at 10-30 cm, and promoted the increase in mass fractions of organic matter, nitrate, and ammonium nitrogen in the soil.Alfalfa monoculture had the most significant increase in mass fractions of organic matter, nitrate, and ammonium nitrogen.In summary, intercropping oat grass and alfalfa in saline-alkali land is beneficial for improving the yield and quality of forage, and also has a certain promoting effect on land quality.

参考文献

[1] 徐恒刚.中国盐生植被及盐渍化生态治理[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2004:40-51.

[2] 吴帅兵,苗琪,王红叶,等.优化氮肥管理提高滨海盐渍土春玉米产量、氮肥利用率及经济效益研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2023,29(9):1573-1586.

[3] 陈菲儿.柽柳对晋北重度盐碱地的改良及其对盐碱胁迫的响应 [D].太原:山西农业大学,2016.

[4] 任明霞,艾加敏,张瑞丽,等.豆科植物根瘤衰老机制与影响因素研究进展[J].微生物学报,2024,64(12):1-28.

[5] 王甜甜,曹丽雯,刘智全,等.黄河三角洲滨海草带建设的饲草基础生物学问题[J].植物学报,2022,57(6):837-847.

[6] WILLEY R.Inter cropping its importance and research needs part1 competition and yield advantages [J].Field Crops Abstracts,1979,32:1-10.

[7] HAUGGAARD N H,JENSEN E S.Facilitative root interaction in intercrops[J].Plant and Soil,2005,274(1/2):237-250.

[8] BROOKER R W,BENNETT A E,CONG W F,et al.Improving intercropping:asynthesis of research in agronomy,plant physiology and ecology[J].New Phytologist,2015,206(1):107-117.

[9] 芦奕晓,牟乐,杨惠敏.豆科与禾本科牧草混播改良土壤的研究进展[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(1):94-100.

[10] GONG X W,DANG K,LV S,et al.Interspecific root interactions and water-use efficiency of intercropped prosomallet and mung bean[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2020,115:126034.

[11] SENGHOR Y,BALDE A B,MANGA A G B,et al.Intercropping millet with low-density cowpea improves millet productivity for low and medium N input in semi-arid central Senegal[J].Heliyon,2023,9(7):e17680.

[12] 张永亮,范富,高凯,等.苜蓿、无芒雀麦单播与混播对土壤有机质和速效养分的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(1):22-23.

[13] 刘丝雨,李香君,赵艳兰,等.不同豆禾混播比例对土壤丛枝菌根真菌的影响[J].四川农业大学学报,2023,41(1):83-91.

[14] 李奇松,李家俊,叶江华,等.玉米/豆科作物间作系统中不同互作因子对群体产量的影响[J].福建农业学报,2020,35(6):582-590.

[15] 张永亮,高凯,于铁峰,等.禾草种类与混播比例对苜蓿-禾草混播系统生产力及种间关系的影响[J].中国草地学报,2020,42(2):47-57.

[16] 魏孔涛,鱼小军,白梅梅,等.混播比例对陇中黄土高原扁蓿豆-无芒雀麦混播草地土壤养分含量及酶活性的影响[J].中国草地学报,2023,45(2):56-66.

[17] 陈逸凡,云岚,艾芊,等.苜蓿与禾草混播对海流图盐碱地土壤改良效果研究[J].草地学报,2023,31(10):3203-3211.

[18] 王文虎,曹文侠,王小军,等.河西走廊荒漠灌区不同豆禾混播对土壤养分及牧草产量的影响[J].中国草地学报,2022,44(5):40-49.

[19] 任文.青藏高原东北缘混播比例对红豆草-垂穗披碱草生长及种间关系的影响[D].兰州:兰州大学,2020.

[20] 杜俊颖,李鑫洋,杨莉,等.冀西北坝上地区豆禾混播草地建植第三年草地生产力变化研究[J].草地学报,2022,30(7):1855-1861.

[21] 苗晓茸,孙艳梅,于磊,等.氮磷互作对不同茬次滴灌苜蓿生产性能及营养品质的影响[J].草业学报,2019,28(9):55-66.

[22] 关皓,许多,李海萍,等.高寒地区17个燕麦品种营养品质及瘤胃降解特性研究[J].草业学报,2024,33(9):185-198.

[23] 王茜,李志坚,李晶,等.不同类型燕麦农艺和饲草品质性状分析[J].草业学报,2019,28(12):149-158.

[24] 王一博,陈奕彤,刘馨迪,等.饲用藜麦在黄河三角洲盐碱地的适应性研究与评价[J].草地学报,2023,31(6):1810-1817.

[25] 向洁,王富强,郭宝光,等.西藏河谷区燕麦与箭筈豌豆混间作对产量和营养品质的影响[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2018,44(5):555-564.

[26] 王伟,徐成体.河南县燕麦和箭筈豌豆不同混播比例草地生产性能的综合评价[J].青海畜牧兽医杂志,2016,46(1):10-12.

[27] 潘多锋,申忠宝,王建丽,等.紫花苜蓿与无芒雀麦混播对松嫩平原盐碱化草地土壤改良效果研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012(10):127-131.

[28] 张金柱.生物有机肥对盐碱土理化性质及苜蓿生理反应影响的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2007:45-47.

[29] 广艳.黄河滩盐碱地苜蓿栽培区土壤特性及牧草品质变化研究[D].咸阳:西北农林科技大学,2016.

[30] HUANG C Y,AMEL G,XU J M,et al.Changes in soil biological properties with the addition of metsulfuron-methyl herbicide [J].Journal of Zhejiang University Science,2000(4):85-90.

[31] 张晓红,徐炳成,李凤民.黄土塬区三种豆科牧草的土壤养分剖面分布特征与平衡[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,66(4):810-817.

[32] 郭胜利,路鹏,党廷辉.退耕还草对土壤水分养分演变的影响[J].西北植物学报,2003(8):1383-1388.

[33] 郑敏娜,韩志顺,梁秀芝,等.不同生长年限紫花苜蓿根系形态特征分析[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(6):60-66.

[34] 邰继承,杨恒山,范富,等.播种方式对紫花苜蓿+无芒雀麦人工草地浅剖面土壤C、N分布及储量的影响[J].草业学报,2010,19(6):41-45.

[35] 肖焱波,李隆,张福锁.豆科-禾本科间作系统中氮营养研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报,2003(6):44-49.

[36] 蔺芳,刘晓静,张家洋.人工草地种植模式对沙化土壤团聚体及有机质含量的影响[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(6):1219-1222.

[37] 李振华.种植紫花苜蓿对武威灌漠土理化性质及土壤微生物的影响[D].兰州:兰州大学,2015:8-12.

[38] 郑伟,朱进忠,加娜尔古丽.不同混播方式豆禾混播草地生产性能的综合评价[J].草业学报,2012,21(6):242-245.

[39] KRISTINA I,SOFIA S,ALEXANDRA S,et al.Soil microbial activity along an altitudinal gradient:vegetation as a main driver beyond topographic and edaphic factors[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2021,168(5):104197.

[40] 莫雪,陈斐杰,游冲,等.黄河三角洲不同植物群落土壤酶活性特征及影响因子分析[J].环境科学,2020,41(2):895-904.

[41] 陈雅轩,张彧璠,王佳乐,等.不同林龄华北落叶松土壤酶活性和碳氮磷化学计量变化[J].生态学报,2024,45(1):1-17.

基本信息:

DOI:10.20062/j.cnki.CN37-1453/N.2025.04.008

中图分类号:S54;S156.4

引用信息:

[1]魏春婧,索立柱,范树高,等.燕麦草和苜蓿间作对盐碱地牧草品质及土壤质量的影响[J].鲁东大学学报(自然科学版),2025,41(04):352-360.DOI:10.20062/j.cnki.CN37-1453/N.2025.04.008.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金(42320104006,42107311); 山东省自然科学基金(ZR2024MD110); 山东省重点研发计划(2022TZXD0045,2023TZXD005); 东营市自然科学基金(2024ZR01)

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文