| 835 | 3 | 88 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
城市化的快速发展导致森林、草地等生态空间遭受挤压,生境破碎化加剧,通过构建合理的生态安全格局可以缓解快速城市化进程中土地利用与生态发展之间的显著矛盾。本研究以烟台市福山区为例,基于形态学空间格局分析(morphological spatial pattern analysis, MSPA)和景观连通性计算方法识别生态源地,选取MSPA景观要素、土地利用类型、高程、坡度、距河流距离等作为阻力因子构建生态阻力面,通过电路理论识别生态廊道、生态“夹点”和生态“障碍点”,综合构建与城市发展相协调的生态安全格局。主要结果如下:(1)共识别出13个生态源地,面积为79.56 km2,占研究区总面积的11.28%,其中主要生态源地是11个,面积为76.68 km2,次要生态源地是2个,面积为2.88 km2;(2)共提取出生态廊道18条,长度为83.06 km,其中主要生态廊道是4条,长度为46.27 km,次要生态廊道是14条,长度为36.79 km;(3)共筛选出83处生态节点,其中生态“夹点”是52处,生态“障碍点”是31处。结合源地、廊道与节点的分布情况,构建了“一核、一带、三区、多廊、多源、多点”的生态安全格局,为区域生态修复和国土开发工作提供科学依据。
Abstract:The rapid urbanization has led to the encroachment of ecological spaces such as forests and grasslands, which exacerbates the habitat fragmentation.By establishing a rational ecological security pattern, the significant conflict between land use and ecological development can be alleviated during the rapid urbanization process.Taking Fushan District in Yantai City as a case study, ecological source areas were identified based on morphological spatial pattern analysis(MSPA) and landscape connectivity methods.MSPA landscape elements, land use types, elevation, slope, and distance to rivers were selected as resistance factors to construct the ecological resistance surface.Ecological corridors, ecological “pinch points”, and ecological “barrier points” were identified by using circuit theory, and an ecological security pattern coordinated with urban development was constructed.The main results are as follows.1) A total of 13 ecological source areas are identified, which covers an area of 79.56 km2 and accounts for 11.28% of the total study area.Among these, 11 primary ecological source areas with an area of 76.68 km2,and 2 secondary ecological source areas covering 2.88 km2,are identified.2) 18 ecological corridors with a total length of 83.06 km are extracted, which includes 4 primary ecological corridors with 46.27 km in length and 14 secondary ecological corridors with 36.79 km in length.3) A total of 83 ecological nodes are selected, which are composed of 52 ecological “pinch points” and 31 ecological “barrier points”.Based on the distributions of source areas, corridors, and nodes, an ecological security pattern of “one core, one belt, three zones, multiple corridors, multiple sources, and multiple points” is constructed to provide a scientific basis for regional ecological restoration and land development.
[1] 李果,王百田.区域生态修复的空间规划方法探讨[J].水土保持研究,2007(6):284-288.
[2] 王晓峰,朱梦娜,张欣蓉,等.基于“源地—阻力—廊道”的三江源区生态安全格局构建[J].生态学报,2024,44(11):4609-4623.
[3] 徐彩瑶,崔铭烨,王宁,等.浙江省生态保护修复优先区识别[J].生态学报,2024,44(8):3223-3240.
[4] PENG J,YANG Y,LIU Y X,et al.Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,644:781-790.
[5] 李倩瑜,唐立娜,邱全毅,等.基于形态学空间格局分析和最小累积阻力模型的城市生态安全格局构建:以厦门市为例[J].生态学报,2024,44(6):2284-2294.
[6] 肖卫东,渠立权,舒帮荣,等.基于MSPA和InVEST模型的淮河源生态网络构建[J].国土资源科技管理,2023,40(2):84-96.
[7] XU A K,HU M J,SHI J,et al.Construction and optimization of ecological network in inland river basin based on circuit theory,complex network and ecological sensitivity:a case study of Gansu section of Heihe River Basin[J].Ecological Modelling,2024,488:110578.
[8] AVON C,BERGES L.Prioritization of habitat patches for landscape connectivity conservation differs between least-cost and resistance distances[J].Landscape Ecology,2016,31:1551-1565.
[9] 陈昕,彭建,刘焱序,等.基于“重要性—敏感性—连通性”框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建[J].地理研究,2017,36(3):471-484.
[10] 史芳宁,刘世梁,安毅,等.基于生态网络的山水林田湖草生物多样性保护研究:以广西左右江为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(23):8930-8938.
[11] 卢泓杏,赵宇鸾.基于生态安全格局的岩溶山地国土空间生态修复关键区识别:以贵州省关岭县为例[J].中国岩溶,2024,43(2):349-363.
[12] 黄木易,岳文泽,冯少茹,等.基于MCR模型的大别山核心区生态安全格局异质性及优化[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(4):771-784.
[13] 张立坤,李令军,赵文慧,等.基于形态空间格局分析方法和最小累积阻力模型的北京市平原区造林工程生态格局分析[J].中国环境监测,2023,39(S1):7-18.
[14] WANG Y,ZHANG L,SONG Y H.Study on the construction of the ecological security pattern of the Lancang River Basin(Yunnan section) based on InVEST-MSPA-circuit theory[J].Sustainability,2022,15(1):477.
[15] 杨学龙,叶秀英,赵小敏,等.基于MSPA与MCR的生态廊道构建及优化研究:以南昌市新建区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2023,42(3):85-91.
[16] 汪沁,於冉,储昭君,等.基于生态评价与电路理论的生态安全格局构建及关键区域识别:以安徽省为例[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(6):209-216.
[17] 方莹,王静,黄隆杨,等.基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态保护修复关键区域诊断与识别:以烟台市为例 [J].自然资源学报,2020,35(1):190-203.
[18] 程研,关颖慧,吴秀芹.基于土地利用变化的喀斯特断陷盆地景观格局演变与生态安全评价[J].生态学报,2023,43(22):9471-9485.
[19] SOILLE P,VOGT P.Morphological segmentation of binary patterns[J].Pattern Recognition Letters,2009,30(4):456-459.
[20] IWANOWSKI M.Morphological classification of binary image pixels[J].Machine Graphics and Vision,2009,18(2):155-173.
[21] 许忠洋,王琤,顾彤,等.基于生态网络的生态修复关键区识别:以延安市为例[J].干旱区地理,2024,47(6):1073-1083.
[22] 李华,郑育桃,黄荷,等.基于MSPA和MCR模型的庐山市生态网络构建[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2024,44(2):98-107.
[23] XU X,WANG S Y,RONG W Z.Construction of ecological network in Suzhou based on the PLUS and MSPA models[J].Ecological Indicators,2023,154:110740.
[24] 汉瑞英,赵志平,肖能文,等.基于最小累积阻力差值模型的北京市生态安全格局构建[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(3):95-102.
[25] HUO J G,SHI Z Q,ZHU W B,et al.Construction and optimization of an ecological network in Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area,China[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2022,19(13):8066.
[26] 樊凡,田国行,刘贺,等.郑州市国土空间生态修复的关键区域识别[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(2):267-276.
[27] 阚恒,丁冠乔,郭杰,等.基于生态安全格局分析的国土空间生态修复关键区域识别:以环太湖城市群为例[J].应用生态学报,2024,35(8):2217-2227.
[28] 薛明月,吴孟泉,郑龙啸,等.基于电路理论的县域生态安全格局构建:以山东省栖霞市为例[J].生态学杂志,2024,43(10):3223-3232.
[29] 黄丽萍,向芳芳,陈荣清.基于生态安全格局的县域国土空间生态保护修复关键区域识别:以抚州市宜黄县为例[J].环境工程技术学报,2023,13(4):1334-1344.
[30] 周燕,刘梦瑶,禹佳宁,等.基于生境网络构建优化的生物多样性保护规划途径研究[J].中国园林,2024,40(5):111-117.
[31] 张海铃,叶长盛,胡梦姗.基于生态安全格局的环鄱阳湖城市群生态修复关键区域识别及修复策略[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(2):393-402.
[32] 丁康,王嘉,于淼,等.邯郸市矿业废弃地的生态修复关键区识别:基于生态功能与空间的重要性[J].应用生态学报,2024,35(6):1671-1680.
基本信息:
DOI:10.20062/j.cnki.CN37-1453/N.2025.02.007
中图分类号:X321
引用信息:
[1]陈刚,吴孟泉,王强,等.基于MSPA和电路理论的生态安全格局构建研究——以烟台市福山区为例[J].鲁东大学学报(自然科学版),2025,41(02):145-155.DOI:10.20062/j.cnki.CN37-1453/N.2025.02.007.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金(42071385); 高分辨率对地观测系统国家科技重大专项(79-Y50-G18-9001-22/23); 山东省科技型中小企业技术创新能力提升工程项目(2022TSGC2371)